Every seminar, meeting, and symposium now discusses AI as if one autonomous agen can replace an entire company by next Monday.
After enough slides, even the audience starts believing it.
A simple analogy: imagine a hospital deciding that specialist doctors can do everything. So it removes the nurses, medical assistants, pharmacists, receptionists, cleaners, security guards, and support staff.
It sounds impressive during a seminar.
It becomes a disaster when the hospital actually needs to operate.
The same thing is happening with AI.
Some companies rushed to replace people with autonomous agents, only to face hallucinations, weak guardrails, uncontrolled token costs, inconsistent results, and eventually the quiet rehiring of the same positions.
I prefer a detached system.
AI helps build the system. Fixed rules handle repeatable processes. Humans remain involved for control, judgment, and accountability.
Our Bank Statement Penyelarasan System follows this approach: less hype, lower cost, repeatable results, and people still in the loop.
AI should strengthen an organisation, not remove the common sense required to run it.
#ArtificialIntelligence #AIAutomation #DetachedSystem #HumanInTheLoop #PKS #BusinessAutomation #AIGovernance #DigitalTransformation
Ruang pembaca
Apa pendapat anda?
Komen baharu dihantar untuk semakan terlebih dahulu. Nama dan email diperlukan, tetapi email tidak dipaparkan kepada pembaca.
The bit about inconsistent results is what I keep coming back to.
Fixed rules handle repeatable processes - sums the whole thing up.
Worth reading just for AI should strengthen an organisation.
I have watched humans remain involved for control go wrong in practice. Good to see it written down. Worth reading twice.
medical assistants, pharmacists, receptionists is the part I would forward to my boss.
Not sure I agree with cleaners, security guards, and support, but the rest holds up.
Whoever wrote this actually did the work on every seminar, meeting, and symposium. Have a few questions left here.
Bookmarked, mostly for weak guardrails, uncontrolled token costs.